Item 1506
OTHER:
Helicopter - Inside - Interleaving ABC - Pros & Cons vs. Coaxial ABCCoaxial
Interleaving
![]()
Advantages of Interleaving:
|
Coaxial:
|
Interleaving: For thrust and downwash of Interleaving configuration see; |
___________________

![]()
Advantages of Coaxial:
![]()
Quotations from 'Implications of the Low Tip Speed Design Philosophy' by the rotorcraft aerodynamist Wieslaw Stepniewski:
![]()
Crudely clipped from PPRuNe posting.
Why the Interleaving is far more convenient for unprepared landing sites than the Coaxial is;
Based on the Boeing 737-700 criteria.
Coaxial rotors with a disk area of 522 sq-ft. fits in a square of 26 x 26 = 666 sq-ft.
Interleaving rotors with a disk area of 522 sq-ft. fits in a square of 31 x 20 = 620 sq-ft.
The above does not include the fuselage.
The interleaving has greater ground clearance under its rotors, due to the dihedral.
![]()
Temporarily copied from Tilt-rotor vs Interleaving 1505.html: May adapt to Coaxial in future.
|
|
Individual Twin Disk: |
Intermeshing Twin Disks: |
Interleaving Twin Disks: |
Tilt-rotor V-22 |
|
Radius of Individual Disk: |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 [19.04 1] |
|
~ |
2.5 |
11 |
11 [46.58 1] |
|
|
Total Area of Disks: |
314.3 |
628.6 |
628.6 |
127.3 [9114.8 1] |
|
Area of Overlap (Circular Segments): |
~ |
284.1 |
107.1 |
~ |
|
Area Excluding Overlaps: |
260.75 |
344.5 |
521.5 |
127.3 [9114.8 1] |
|
Total Lateral Span: |
20.0 |
22.5 |
31.0 |
20 [84.55 1] |
|
Total Longitudinal Span: |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
9 [76.16 1] |
![]()
Additional Advantages:
OTHER: Aerodynamic - Rotor Disk - Dual Configuration - Interleaving ~ Advantages
![]()
Location of Zero Velocity over Fuselage at Noted Advance Ratios:
Placed here, for now, because there was no where else to put it

![]()
Introduction Page | UniCopter Home Page | SynchroLite Home Page | Nemesis Home Page
Last Revised: December 23, 2007