Item 1506

OTHER: Helicopter - Inside - Interleaving ABC - Pros & Cons vs. Coaxial ABC

Coaxial Interleaving

Advantages of Interleaving:

Coaxial:

Interleaving:

For thrust and downwash of Interleaving configuration see;

OTHER: Helicopter - Inside - Interleaving - Morphing

___________________

Advantages of Coaxial:

Quotations from 'Implications of the Low Tip Speed Design Philosophy' by the rotorcraft aerodynamist Wieslaw Stepniewski:

Crudely clipped from PPRuNe posting.

Why the Interleaving is far more convenient for unprepared landing sites than the Coaxial is;

Based on the Boeing 737-700 criteria.

Coaxial rotors with a disk area of 522 sq-ft. fits in a square of 26 x 26 = 666 sq-ft.
Interleaving rotors with a disk area of 522 sq-ft. fits in a square of 31 x 20 = 620 sq-ft.

The above does not include the fuselage.

The interleaving has greater ground clearance under its rotors, due to the dihedral.

Temporarily copied from Tilt-rotor vs Interleaving 1505.html: May adapt to Coaxial in future.

 

Individual Twin Disk:

Intermeshing Twin Disks:

Interleaving Twin Disks:

Tilt-rotor V-22

Radius of Individual Disk:

10

10

10

10 [19.04 1]

Stagger:

~

2.5

11

11 [46.58 1]

Total Area of Disks:

314.3

628.6

628.6

127.3 [9114.8 1]

Area of Overlap (Circular Segments):

~

284.1

107.1

~

Area Excluding Overlaps:

260.75

344.5

521.5

127.3 [9114.8 1]

Total Lateral Span:

20.0

22.5

31.0

20 [84.55 1]

Total Longitudinal Span:

20.0

20.0

20.0

9 [76.16 1]

Additional Advantages:

OTHER: Aerodynamic - Rotor Disk - Dual Configuration - Interleaving ~ Advantages

Location of Zero Velocity over Fuselage at Noted Advance Ratios:

Placed here, for now, because there was no where else to put it

Introduction Page | UniCopter Home Page | SynchroLite Home Page | Nemesis Home Page

Last Revised: December 23, 2007